Where I'll be tracking my key learnings and insights throughout my degree

Author: tomhoyerwood (Page 3 of 3)

Indigenous Resurgence in Victoria

On this third week of learning about Victoria, I wanted to stay with the topic of the Indigenous nations here. However, I wanted to refocus my attention away from the history of colonialism, and look at the ways those nations were asserting their rights and culture today. All too often in education, Indigenous peoples are talked through exclusively through a victim narrative, that erases their agency and the meaningful impacts they have made and continue to make. This narrative also perpetuates a doom and gloom outlook, in which we ignore the positive strides that have been made; sharing these stories helps inspire hope, which is a necessary precursor to action. I hope in my classroom to investigate and center the efforts of the Lekwungen, the WSANEC, and other Indigenous groups.

One great example of this is the “Signs of L蓹k虛史蓹艐蓹n“, a project that has seven carvings throughout the city of Victoria that mark places of cultural significance. You can visit the different carvings and learn about the significance of the place that they are marking. For instance the one placed at Songhees Point tells that once infants were able to walk, their cradles were placed at this point, because of the spiritual power of the water there. It is my goal to visit each of these in the coming couple of weeks, and reflect on how to potentially incorporate them into my classroom. For example, it might be interesting for students to learn about the places and visit them, and then plan where their own signs would be, for important places in their personal or cultural history.

Another aspect of Indigenous resurgence is language revitalization. I learned in my research that BC is home to 34 Indigenous languages, which is more than half of Canada’s 60! Language can act as a critical gateway into tradition, culture, and values. However, just 3% of First Nations in BC consider themselves to be fluent in their ancestral language. In 2019 though, the UN sanctioned 2019 as the year of Indigenous languages, raising awareness and support for language revitalization programs globally (source here). The Songhees Nation has begun a Language Revitalization Program, that consists of regular lessons taught by an elder who is the only first language speaker of Lekwungen.

Another side of language revitalization is integrating the Lekwungen language more fully into the city. In 2018, Victoria’s new library was named sx史e艐x史蓹艐 t蓹艐蓹x史 James Bay Branch. Many residents pushed for a Lekwungen name, and Dr. Elmer Seniemten George to decide the name (which is the Lekwungen name for the area of James Bay). Source here. Similarly, in Oak Bay (where I am currently living), the council recently unanimously approved a plan to work with the Songhees and Esquimalt nations to add Lekwungen names to frequently visited places.

UVIC put out a guide to supporting the revitalization of Indigenous languages that you can access here if you’re interested in learning more. This video is a short summary of its ideas.

Quite recently the Songhees nation announced an ambitious tourism plan that will offer marine tours, canoe tours, retreats, nature walks, and workshops. This is something I’m personally excited to take part in, as I know there is a clear limit to how much I can learn from online research. They expect the tours to begin in 2022 though, so I will have to be patient!

This all got me thinking about the role of education in supporting these initiatives. I think incorporating learning phrases, place names, and listening to Indigenous artists would be a valuable pursuit to in the classroom. These might accompany a land acknowledgement, which can often feel too much like a check-mark. But what if the land acknowledgement incorporated a new word that everyone was learning and practicing together? What if students explored and investigated Indigenous history and current resurgence in Victoria with the same rigor that they learn about WWII? What would that look like? These are a few of the questions I’m left thinking about.

Videos, 5HP, and Classroom Learning

In class on Friday we explored the power of video as an educational tool. I had always seen the value of bringing in videos from online as teaching tools (after all, why not have someone with a much higher budget and lots more time explain a concept?!), but the class got me thinking more broadly. Video is a great example of the power of technology for accessibility: videos can be slowed down, replayed, and captioned to support learners. A major challenge in the classroom is differentiating learning, knowing that everyone learns at their own pace. Video helps solve this problem; fast learners can whizz through a video while slower learners can take their time without feeling embarrassed.

I also have very fond memories of creating videos in school as part of assignments. Videos were a way I could access my creativity, while having a lot of fun with my classmates. At the same time, creating a video on a topic required sifting through a lot of knowledge, boiling it down to the most important points, and creating a persuasive and engaging narrative. These are all skills that are valuable for students to learn.

I imagine part of the challenge of integrating technology into the classroom is supporting students with learning how to use it. That’s why I found Rich’s workshop so valuable; they workshop was centered around a “go-at-your-own-pace” style, in which you worked through different Google Documents that outlined and explained the different steps to help you get more comfortable. Normally, creating guides like this would take too much time for a teacher to be able to do, but I was so excited to hear that the UVIC Libraries Digital Scholarship Commons has all of these guides or “Lesson Plans” available under the Creative Commons license on their website here.聽 This really helps support educators and students in learning new skills. For instance, for a summative unit assignment, I could give my students the option to make a video, a podcast, a storyboard, or an infographic; one class could be spent with the students learning how to use the tool they’re interested in guided by these lesson plans. Taking part in the workshop also helped me realize that we can’t expect students to just know (or easily learn) how to use these software, as this can be very frustrating and they will likely choose to take the easy way out (by choosing a software they already know). By having resources and time set aside for these skills, I think teachers can help broaden everyone’s skillset.

Another tool I learned about through the workshop that I am very interested in learning more about is H5P, which allows you to make any video interactive, with a variety of question types and texts to prompt the reader to think about what they’re seeing. This would be a really great tool in an online or blended classroom environment, to help support learners be active participants in their learning, rather than mindlessly (or distractedly) consuming video content. Choosing the questions would take some serious thought, as I have taken part in online trainings that use a similar software and it can turn into a game of “how fast can I get through these video questions?” Critical, interesting, and scaffolded questions might help create more interest for the learner. I also found it took quite a long time to make a video interactive, and so it would probably make the most sense if you could re-use the video year after year.

I’m really happy we got to play around with these tools and I am excited to brainstorm ways to implement them into my lesson and unit planning!

A (Very Very Incomplete) History of the Lekwungen

For this week’s research, I tried to learn more about the Lekwungen people (made up of the Songhees and Esquimalt), whose territory I am currently living on. With the National Day for Truth and Reconciliation having just passed, I found myself spending hours researching online trying to get a grasp on the Lekwungen history and culture. I’m frustrated that this was not part of my education; when I learned about Indigenous nations in Canada, it was always as though these nations no longer existed. Furthermore, there was no emphasis on the local nations. Instead they were lumped all together and I would be more likely to learn about Indigenous nations in the Prairies than in my hometown. I hope as an educator I can help make this information more accessible for my students, to help give them a better grasp of the land they’re on, and its caretakers.

Traditionally, Lekwungen people would gather berries, and seaweed, as well as catch herring and migratory ducks using nets. They would hunt deer and elk, and dig for clams. Their villages dotted the lower island, including a thriving village at what is now Willows Beach in Oak Bay.

Lekwungen, like other Indigenous nations, traditionally saw a spiritual dimension in all living things. Dance and ceremony accompanied important events such as the gathering of camas. Camas was traditionally an important food source that the Lekwungen women would cultivate. Through controlled burning, the Lekwungen women transformed densely forested areas into open meadows where the camas could thrive. This impact of this controlled burning can be seen in places such as Beacon Hill Park, and Uplands Park today. James Douglas and the British were actually attracted to settle in Victoria because of these open fields, which they mistakenly viewed as wasted land that could be cultivated; in fact, the land was currently being actively cultivated (Lutz, 2008).

Camas is still being cultivated by Lekwungen women and I found this great video about Cheryl Bryce from 2010 speaking to that. I used H5P to make the video a bit more interactive, to try to put into practice what we learned in class on Friday.

When Douglas and the British did settle in Victoria on behalf of the Hudson’s Bay Company in 1843, the Lekwungen people welcomed them openly. Hundreds of them supported with building the fort, and there was a vibrant trade relationship between them. The center of the Lekwungen’s economy was blankets, and so these were often what was given in return for labour or land. The Douglas Treaties (written about in more detail here), were signed as ways for the British to secure land, but the Lekwungen’s different understandings of property rights, ways of living,  and the need for continuing renewals meant they had a much different understanding of the agreements than the British.

As years progressed and more migrants came to Victoria, they brought with them deadly diseases as well as challenging social changes. In conjunction with oppressive and sometimes genocidal government policies, the Lekwungen population declined (Lutz, 2008). I found this interesting piece by CBC that investigates the question: “Can a city rooted in colonial history be a progressive site for reconciliation?” It examines the way Victoria sells its tourism through its colonial identity, and the tensions with the goals of reconciliation.

Of course one of the dark chapters of the colonial history were residential schools, something we’re often taught generally but not specific to our location. Chek News wrote up a 5 part series on the history of residential schools on Vancouver Island here that I would recommend reading. Much of this challenging history was the center of the National Day for Truth and Reconciliation. As I was in the crowd last Thursday at Centennial Square, I was moved by the elders speaking on stage about the importance of moving forward with love and compassion. The crowd in the square was huge and it gave me hope that meaningful change has begun to happen. Next week, I hope to explore some examples of resurgence and reconciliation amongst the Indigenous nations in the area.

If you’re interested in learning more about the history of the Lekwungen people, I found the most comprehensive resource for my research was University of Victoria’s History Professor John Lutz’s book “Makuk: A New History of Aboriginal-White Relations“, which has a chapter entitled “The Lekwungen.” It is available for online reading through the University of Victoria. If anyone has any other resources to share (particularly if written by a someone who identifies as Lekwungen or WSANEC), I would love to know!

Grappling with the Question of Phones

In class this week we were fortunate enough to have Jesse Miller speak with us about the issues surrounding technology, social media, and privacy in classrooms. I was initially struck by Jesse’s perspective that seemed to go against the standard grain of blaming technology for the ills of our society. Instead, Jesse took the perspective that technology doesn’t lead to more negative behaviours, as much as it amplifies the negative behaviours that were already there. I think there’s a lot of truth to this, especially given the ways we have seen disinformation and other negative types of media spread across social media platforms these last few years.

Jesse seemed to believe that a lot of the negative attitudes around technology and social media with youth were overblown and often contributed to frustrations amongst students who feel their parents and teachers act paternalistically towards them, by say, taking their phone away. I agree that it’s important we don’t shame young people around their technology use, and a better path might be to show interest in what they are looking at. At the same time, I’m not sure that I agree that it is necessarily wrong to take your students phones during class time.

These phones and apps are developed by giant corporations to be as addictive as possible. The driving motivator behind them is not utility or well-being, but profit from the sales of devices and ads on the platforms. I can say that for myself, my phone rarely gives me feelings of joy or satisfaction, and more often prevents me from doing things that actually are good for me. I found the movie “The Social Dilemma” on Netflix did a great job at making these points clear.

Ideally, educators could work with students to develop healthy habits with their phones. But if students are so addicted that their phones prevent them from properly listening and being present in the space to engage with any lessons, that may not work without stronger measures.

So if it is our responsibility as educators to support the emotional and intellectual development of our students, I think there is an appropriate argument to leave cellphones at the door. I personally wish we lived in a society where it was more normalized to leave our cell phones at home whenever possible.

Understanding UVIC’s Land Acknowledgement

To launch my inquiry project into Victoria, I knew I first had to learn more about the Indigenous peoples that lived here. I am disappointed to say that this was not a part of my education growing up. Living in Toronto as an adult, I was fortunate enough to learn about the Anishinaabe and Haudenosaunee peoples and it felt weird returning to Victoria with almost zero knowledge of the traditional caretakers of this territory. I am happy to see that this discourse has changed and these conversations are being had more and more.

I believe it is part of my role as a settler educator to do a lot of research so that we can respectfully include local Indigenous perspectives, stories, and learning principles in the classroom. Indeed, not speaking to these issues, is itself perpetuating the long history of colonialism. But it can be hard given the new pronunciations, different worldviews, and the fact that colonists attempted to erase so much of the history.

I realized upon my research that I didn’t even understand the very basics about this region.

We acknowledge and respect the聽l蓹k虛史蓹艐蓹n聽peoples on whose traditional territory the university stands and the Songhees, Esquimalt and W瘫S脕NE膯 peoples whose historical relationships with the land continue to this day. (source here).

This is the UVIC Territory Acknowledgement and I was unclear the details of who they were referring to: who are the Songhees, the Esquimalt, the W瘫S脕NE膯聽, and the l蓹k虛史蓹艐蓹n聽, and how do they relate to each other? How do they relate to the Coast Salish? I found these seemingly simple question took a while for me to get straight. Below I’ve laid out what I’ve found as a way to cement my learning (and please let me know if I’ve made an error so I can correct it!)

The l蓹k虛史蓹艐蓹n 

Songhees and Esquimalt are nations that make up the l蓹k虛史蓹艐蓹n聽(pronounced lay-kwung-gen and often seen written as ‘Lekwungen’) peoples, which is a language group. The word l蓹k虛史蓹艐蓹n聽means ‘Place to Smoke Herring’, since herring was a critical aspect of the nations’ economy and culture. The herring used to run in the Gorge Waterway and helped supply the Lekwungen peoples with food and goods to trade with other nations.聽

A speaker in this video (published by Victoria SD 61) breaks down the some of the historical roots of the words:


I found the following quote particularly helpful: “from my understanding as ‘place to smoke herring people’, Lekwungen was our original name for this area, and Songhees and Esquimalt became acquired names through contact and negotiation. The meaning, as it’s been taught to me, our word ‘lekwung’, which means smoked herring, and l蓹k虛史蓹艐蓹n, means ‘place to smoke herring’, and then, Lekwungen often refers to the language of this land.”

The W瘫S脕NE膯 

Conversely, the W瘫S脕NE膯 (pronounced weh-say-nutch) are made up of the following Indigenous Nations:

Tsartlip (Sart-Lip), Pauquachin (Paw-Qua-Chin), Tsawout (Say-Out), Tseycum (Sigh-Come) and聽Malahat (Mal-a-hat) Nations (source here). The W瘫S脕NE膯聽share the language SEN膯O纽EN.

All of these nations fall within the larger group of the Coast Salish, a group of ethnically and linguistically related Indigenous peoples along the North West Coast (source here).

Resources

If you’re interested in learning more and deepening your understanding, I would encourage you to check out some of these resources that helped me as I was researching:

First People’s Map: a new, interactive map of Indigenous culture and territories in BC created by Indigenous people.

Vancouver Island Map of First Nations: a Vancouver Island Map with the 50 First Nations on the Island and where they’re located.

Reflections on the Inquiry

I found this information surprisingly confusing and difficult to wrap my head around. It made me wish I just had someone who understood it all and could explain it to me in a few minutes, rather than the hours I spent on my own. This speaks to me about the value of having a content expert in education, and the drawbacks of the free inquiry process: it can take a long time and be frustrating.

At the same time, I learned a lot more from the act of researching, that I wouldn’t have even known to look for. For instance, I learned about different cultural practices that I now plan to follow-up on to continue my learning in this area. I always thought teachers were a good way to introduce you to things you didn’t know you didn’t know, but now see how free inquiry is also very effective at this.

Technology of course, was hugely important for my research. Almost all of it came from the internet research, and a lot was aided by videos on Youtube (a few posted by Victoria SD 61, which was great to see!) The interactive maps helped clarify some questions for me, and it’s clear that many of these nations are utilizing this technology as a way to strengthen their cultures and communities.

Would love to hear any feedback or thoughts from others on my post.

Introducing My Free Inquiry Project: Rediscovering Victoria

For the last 10 years I have lived in Montreal and Toronto and built meaningful connections to those places. I have recently returned to Victoria, which is where I grew up, and am realizing how little I know about the place I call home. As a youth, I was pretty wrapped up in my high school activities and studies, few of which were focused on Victoria itself.

I don鈥檛 like this feeling. I believe it鈥檚 important to develop a deep connection and relationship to the place you are, its history, its natural world, and its communities. Victoria is a place full of wonder, and yet if I had a friend visiting from out of town, I think I would give a lousy tour. As an educator, I want to ground my lessons in Victoria, in how my students see the issues and ideas we鈥檙e talking about in their local communities. Place-based education is a promising way to engage students and develop their skills and awareness around social, political, and environmental issues. I recommend this article  by David Greenwood for anyone interested in learning more about the potential for this approach.     

For these reasons, I have decided to center my inquiry on learning more about the city that helped raise me and made me who I am. I plan to research, explore, and relate to Victoria in a new way. I will be guided by Greenwood鈥檚 three core questions to do so:

  1. What happened here? (historical)
  2. What is happening here now and in what direction is this place headed? (socioecological)
  3. What should happen here? (ethical)

To learn about Victoria is an incredibly broad endeavour, but I would like to keep it broad and see where my interests and research take me. Some potential things I would like to cover include:

  1. The Indigenous communities here, their history, and current culture and presence
  2. The biodiversity and natural history
  3. City monuments and landmarks and their significance
  4. Local heroes / people working to make Victoria better
  5. Ideas for connecting key BC curricular pieces to Victoria and lesson ideas

I plan to learn about Victoria through a variety of ways including:

  1. Online articles and research
  2. Youtube Videos
  3. Talking / Interviewing People
  4. Visiting Places (like museums, landmarks, etc.)

    If anyone has any suggestions or ideas, I would welcome them! Thanks for reading 馃槉

Most Likely to Succeed: A Documentary to Learn From

The first week and a half of this program has been fast-paced and thought-provoking! One of the most memorable times was watching the documentary “Most Likely to Succeed”, which profiles High Tech High (trailer here). High Tech High is a school that has reimagined the traditional classroom and created a heavy focus on student-led inquiry.

I have done a lot of reading around inquiry in the past, but I had never seen it in action quite like in this film. The documentary helped to illustrate the excitement that was generated around the student’s projects and the meaningful growth that resulted. The projects encapsulated the idea of authentic assessment for me; rather than writing a test or a paper that had no real impact, these students were creating something real in the world that would be showcased to a large audience. The result was clear: they were fully invested.

Watching the documentary, I couldn’t help but think how I would have responded in such an environment. My school experience was more traditional, and I mostly learned how to be a decent test-taker and paper-writer. In university, these skills helped me, but I lacked confidence to participate in discussions during seminars, and found myself learning in order to do well in the class, not for any intrinsic excitement or interest it brought me. It was only years later that I began to discover a genuine love of learning, and I wonder what role the public education system played in that. Perhaps if I had been at High Tech High, I would have discovered passions and strengths in myself that I didn’t know were there.
 

It is that potential for wonder and excitement that is so powerful about this approach to education. I had a wonderful professor, Garfield Gini-Newman, who is an expert in inquiry-based learning and believes deeply in the educator’s role to ignite wonder in their students. His TED Talk is here and I would recommend to anyone who wants to learn of others taking similar approaches.
 

What seems to be the primary tension of this “High Tech High” style of education is the unfortunate reality that post-secondary institutions are not set up in the same way. A number of students as well as a mother expressed concern that they would not be properly prepared for college admissions. It is sad to think that a major obstacle is the rigidness of post-secondary institutions. I thought it would be interesting to hear how the students in the documentary fared after leaving high school, but unfortunately could not find a follow-up piece.

I tried to boil down some of the lessons I’m taking away from this film:

  1. Critically question what is important to teach
  2. Live with teaching less if it means going deeper
  3. Create authentic assessments for students that will drive their internal motivation for their work
  4. Create a culture in which mistakes are learning opportunities

Newer posts »